As a programmer, you are able to make your own choices about your driver, and
choose an acceptable trade-off between the programming time required and the flexibility
of the result. Though it may appear strange to say that a driver is “flexible,” we
like this word because it emphasizes that the role of a device driver is providing
mechanism, not policy.
The distinction between mechanism and policy is one of the best ideas behind the
Unix design. Most programming problems can indeed be split into two parts: “what
capabilities are to be provided” (the mechanism) and “how those capabilities can be
used” (the policy). If the two issues are addressed by different parts of the program,
or even by different programs altogether, the software package is much easier to
develop and to adapt to particular needs.
For example, Unix management of the graphic display is split between the X server,
which knows the hardware and offers a unified interface to user programs, and the
window and session managers, which implement a particular policy without knowing
anything about the hardware. People can use the same window manager on different
hardware, and different users can run different configurations on the same
workstation. Even completely different desktop environments, such as KDE and
GNOME, can coexist on the same system. Another example is the layered structure
of TCP/IP networking: the operating system offers the socket abstraction, which
implements no policy regarding the data to be transferred, while different servers are
in charge of the services (and their associated policies). Moreover, a server like ftpd
provides the file transfer mechanism, while users can use whatever client they prefer;
both command-line and graphic clients exist, and anyone can write a new user interface
to transfer files.
choose an acceptable trade-off between the programming time required and the flexibility
of the result. Though it may appear strange to say that a driver is “flexible,” we
like this word because it emphasizes that the role of a device driver is providing
mechanism, not policy.
The distinction between mechanism and policy is one of the best ideas behind the
Unix design. Most programming problems can indeed be split into two parts: “what
capabilities are to be provided” (the mechanism) and “how those capabilities can be
used” (the policy). If the two issues are addressed by different parts of the program,
or even by different programs altogether, the software package is much easier to
develop and to adapt to particular needs.
For example, Unix management of the graphic display is split between the X server,
which knows the hardware and offers a unified interface to user programs, and the
window and session managers, which implement a particular policy without knowing
anything about the hardware. People can use the same window manager on different
hardware, and different users can run different configurations on the same
workstation. Even completely different desktop environments, such as KDE and
GNOME, can coexist on the same system. Another example is the layered structure
of TCP/IP networking: the operating system offers the socket abstraction, which
implements no policy regarding the data to be transferred, while different servers are
in charge of the services (and their associated policies). Moreover, a server like ftpd
provides the file transfer mechanism, while users can use whatever client they prefer;
both command-line and graphic clients exist, and anyone can write a new user interface
to transfer files.
