function of Cross linking?
Cross linking is used to refer the process of linking one site to another site and provide a way to allow the accessing to it.
It doesn’t need to be owned by the same person as it provides the methods that have been be built on the Internet.
It provides the users with reference sites that consist of the contents similar to the viewing of the site of the document with certain defaults.
It serves the purpose to display the page on the search engines using search engine optimization techniques and methods.
It doesn’t need to be owned by the same person as it provides the methods that have been be built on the Internet.
It provides the users with reference sites that consist of the contents similar to the viewing of the site of the document with certain defaults.
It serves the purpose to display the page on the search engines using search engine optimization techniques and methods.
What is the function of body content relevance?
The body content helps you having the higher ranking in the search engines and allows good optimization of the sites and pages.
- Body content allows the use of many statements and elements to be used to display it on the web front.
- Body content is used to have the relevance of using the tags that focuses on more on increasing the popularity.
- Body content allows the use of many statements and elements to be used to display it on the web front.
- Body content is used to have the relevance of using the tags that focuses on more on increasing the popularity.
What Kind of Things have you Done on the Social Side?
A pretty broad question as there are no right or wrong answers. Its more
about what works. This question is purposely open ended as I just want
to know what the interviewee has worked on in the past. The answer, for
me is not based on how well you know Facebook and Twitter, but simply
given the opportunity, do you have enough knowledge to be able to
leverage social platforms to achieve a particular goal.
Tell us what a Search-friendly Site Looks Like?
Pretty basic I know, but I'm looking to find out whether or not the
applicant has updated what he or she knows about on-site optimisation.
Keyword research, title tags, urls, content, alt tags, site structure,
navigation, internal linking, site maps, subdomains are all part of what
I'm expecting to hear. However, what I don't what to hear is:
Google can't crawl javaScript
Google can't follow JavaScript links
Keyword density must be X percent
Google can't read Ajax
Meta keywords are very important and should spend time including them
Meta descriptions are not so important
Google can't crawl javaScript
Google can't follow JavaScript links
Keyword density must be X percent
Google can't read Ajax
Meta keywords are very important and should spend time including them
Meta descriptions are not so important
Read This Before You Have Your Coffee
Revenge of the sources
understand why a professional journalist like Nate Thayer would be frustrated
at being asked to work for “exposure” rather than work for pay, though I
think it’s unprofessional to vent that frustration by publishing the
e-mails and the name of the junior editor who made the request.
But behind this debate lurks an uncomfortable fact: The salaries of professional journalists are built upon our success in convincing experts of all kinds working for exposure rather than pay. Now those experts have found a way to work for exposure without going through professional journalists, creating a vast expansion in the quantity and quality of content editors can get for free.
Call it the revenge of our sources. For a very long time, we got them to work for nothing more than exposure — and sometimes, we didn’t even give them that. Now they’re getting more and more of us to do it.
Ask somebody who writes for a magazine or a newspaper what they do and it’s rare, at least in my experience, to hear them say they’re a “writer.” Instead, they say they’re a “reporter” or a “journalist.” The difference between “writer” and “reporter” or “journalist” isn’t that the journalist reports — she develops sources, calls people, takes them out to lunch, and generally acts as an intermediary between her audience and the world of experts.
The journalist also writes, of course, but anybody can write. Or, if not anybody, then certainly too many people for comfort. But few can get their calls returned by key congressmen, top academics, important CEOs or even, absent the legitimacy of a media organization people have heard of, a factory worker sitting at home on a Tuesday night. That is the powerful advantage that the journalist has over her audience: She’s got sources and they don’t.
If the transaction between the journalist and the audience is that the journalist has the time, talent, and access to clearly communicate the ideas of newsmakers and experts, what then is the transaction between the journalist and those newsmakers and experts? After all, the journalist, and her institution, are profiting, hopefully handsomely, off their contribution to the enterprise. It’s not going too far to say that the whole business would collapse without their participation. Journalists without sources are, well, mere writers.
But behind this debate lurks an uncomfortable fact: The salaries of professional journalists are built upon our success in convincing experts of all kinds working for exposure rather than pay. Now those experts have found a way to work for exposure without going through professional journalists, creating a vast expansion in the quantity and quality of content editors can get for free.
Call it the revenge of our sources. For a very long time, we got them to work for nothing more than exposure — and sometimes, we didn’t even give them that. Now they’re getting more and more of us to do it.
Ask somebody who writes for a magazine or a newspaper what they do and it’s rare, at least in my experience, to hear them say they’re a “writer.” Instead, they say they’re a “reporter” or a “journalist.” The difference between “writer” and “reporter” or “journalist” isn’t that the journalist reports — she develops sources, calls people, takes them out to lunch, and generally acts as an intermediary between her audience and the world of experts.
The journalist also writes, of course, but anybody can write. Or, if not anybody, then certainly too many people for comfort. But few can get their calls returned by key congressmen, top academics, important CEOs or even, absent the legitimacy of a media organization people have heard of, a factory worker sitting at home on a Tuesday night. That is the powerful advantage that the journalist has over her audience: She’s got sources and they don’t.
If the transaction between the journalist and the audience is that the journalist has the time, talent, and access to clearly communicate the ideas of newsmakers and experts, what then is the transaction between the journalist and those newsmakers and experts? After all, the journalist, and her institution, are profiting, hopefully handsomely, off their contribution to the enterprise. It’s not going too far to say that the whole business would collapse without their participation. Journalists without sources are, well, mere writers.
Technology-News
Google said Friday it will cut 1,200 more jobs at its Motorola Mobility division, following the announcement of 4,000 layoffs in 2012.
The new job cuts represent 10% of the struggling mobile device maker's staff.Google (GOOG, Fortune 500) has preached patience in its turnaround effort of Motorola. When the search giant completed its $12.5 billion purchase of Motorola in May 2012, it inherited a product pipeline of about 18 months. That means Google hasn't yet been able to release Motorola-branded smartphones of its own design.
Meanwhile, Motorola's mobile business continues to bleed red ink. It lost $353 million in the fourth quarter of 2012, and Google's Chief Financial Officer Patrick Pichette has said he expects Motorola's financial results will be volatile "for quite awhile."
Edith Ramirez tapped to lead FTC
(Jon Elswick / AP)
Ramirez has served as an FTC commissioner since 2010.
A talking shoe in Google’s ‘Playground’
SXSW 2013 | The company let attendees play with new technologies at their SXSW event space.
MakerBot introduces Digitizer
SXSW 2013 | The company introduced a 3D scanner as part of its 3D maker “ecosystem.”
ISO: The future of TV
SXSW 2013 | The Post’s Vijay Ravindran chronicles his hunt for the future of television.
FTC charges people with sending millions of unwanted text messages
The agency said the defendants sent over 180 million spam texts in total.
SXSW 201: Will it be objects over apps?
Will this be the year when the maker movement trumps apps and makes its mark?
The fate of the modern ideas festival
When it comes to today’s ideas festivals, it’s much like the film industry: there are indies and blockbusters.
SpaceX Dragon capsule rendezvous with ISS delayed
At least two of the capsules thrusters are back online, but its scheduled berthing with the space station has been delayed.
Interview: Should your doctor be a robot?
An interview with Jonathan Cohn, author of a fascinating new story
on whether IBM's Watson -- or its successor -- will eventually be your
doctor.
Bill and Mark’s excellent coding adventure
Bill Gates and Mark Zuckerberg, along with other big names in tech, call for more students to learn code.
The unlikely star of SXSW: Grumpy Cat
Beyond the DMZ: Tweeting from North Korea
Google cuts another 1,200 Motorola jobs CNNMoney.com
What to watch for at South by Southwest
Bill Gates' classroom of the future CNNMoney.com
Pandora up 20%, CEO steps down CNNMoney.com
Apple and Google's huge streaming music gamble
Gates, Zuckerberg: Kids, learn to code
Gates: More kids should learn to program
The biggest announcement Facebook didn't make CNNMoney.com
Facebook to announce new look for News Feed
SXSW may have peaked, and that's not a bad thing
Game for students aims to make Congress serious fun
By John Gaudiosi, Special to CNN
Yahoo CEO Marissa Mayer received a $1.12 million cash bonus for her
half-year on the job in 2012 and restricted stock worth another $13.3
million, according to company filings.
Yahoo's Mayer gets $1.1 million bonus
Samsung buys stake in struggling Sharp
Charles Riley
internet marketing strategy
Customer Centricity
- User experience
- Customer experience management
- Voice of the customer
- Mobile app vs. mobile web
- Mobile as the ‘glue’ connecting channels
- Mobile commerce
- Measuring the value of social media
- Social CRM
- Attribution management
- Social for search engine optimization
- Social commerce
- Social media management
- From bought media to earned media
- From impression to expression
- Enriched content: video, games, apps, metadata etc.
SOCIAL MEDIA
- 30% of Top Brands Have Dedicated Twitter Feeds for Customer Service
- What Brands Need to Know About Facebook's News Feed Redesign
- Facebook May Charge Users to Remove Ads, Patent Application Reveals
MOBILE MARKETING
- FTC Files Suits Against Mobile Marketers Accused of Sending Spammy Texts
- Marketers Push to Take Email Mobile
- YouTube App Update Suggests Paid Channels Are on the Way
INTERNET MARKETING
- YouTube to Launch Music Streaming Service, Take on Spotify
- Which Content Marketing Tactics Get the Best ROI?
- 5 Ways You Pay More for Google Clicks